Trending Topics

      Next match: Fulham v LFC [Premier League] Sun 21st Apr @ 4:30 pm
      Craven Cottage

      Today is the 19th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P32 W19 D8 L5

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Fans vote for or against VAR

      VAR

      Read 238485 times
      0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
      shawspeed
      • Forum Billy Liddell
      • ****

      • 562 posts | 128 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1633: Apr 21, 2023 05:58:36 pm
      https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12861173/var-use-in-premier-league-has-improved-says-independent-panel-as-howard-webb-targets-specialists

      1 error identified per every 37.5 games. Much improved from the rate of 1 error per every 3.8 games, pre VAR.

      Like it or lump it, it works.

      And what's the stats for incidents where VAR should have been used but wasn't,  serious foul play etc?
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1634: Apr 21, 2023 06:50:35 pm
      And what's the stats for incidents where VAR should have been used but wasn't,  serious foul play etc?

      That silly kunt knows nothing about what is and isnā€™t serious foul play. Last year in the United V Spurs match the hair on McTominays arms caught Son in the face and the silly kunt said he should have been sent off for serious foul play.  :lmao:  :lmao:          https://youtube.com/watch?v=t5RiQJwanks&feature=share                                           
      « Last Edit: Apr 21, 2023 06:56:30 pm by Keith Singleton »
      lfc across the water
      • Needs a Klopp hug...Rafa's Number 1 fan...VAR has no faults Promoter
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,863 posts | 704 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1635: Apr 22, 2023 01:25:10 pm
      Quote from shawspeed
      And what's the stats for incidents where VAR should have been used but wasn't,  serious foul play etc?

      That's what the handful of errors refer to.

      Quote from Keith Singleton
      That silly knows nothing about what is and isnā€™t serious foul play. Last year in the United V Spurs match the hair on McTominays arms caught Son in the face and the silly said he should have been sent off for serious foul play.           

      I know the lotg are not your strong point, but for someone desperate to drag it up at every opportunity, (even when replying to someone who genuinely wants to know if/when VAR should get involved rather than not) it's unbelievable that even after the edit, you still can't get the year of it right. Never mind, you continue getting your facts wrong, and I'll continue to remind you of facts that are actually true.

      Liverpool 7-0 mancs
      :lmao:

      Now, thanks to a generous st holder making his match ticket available on the club website, I'm off to the game today to take my seat, fully aware that VAR may have to step in at some point, which given what's at stake, is fair enough. It hasn't dampened my enthusiasm or put me off going. I expect to find you taking up space here instead, posting about stuff you admit you haven't a clue about and don't understand. As usual.
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1636: Apr 26, 2023 09:37:55 pm
      Think you lot  got away with one there. 🤦ā€ā™‚ļø Looked a penalty to me.   ;D The rules so subjective on the hand ball rule it literally can go any way these days.  :f_doh:
      AussieRed
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,689 posts | 6692 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1637: Apr 27, 2023 01:14:15 am
      Think you lot  got away with one there. 🤦ā€ā™‚ļø Looked a penalty to me.   ;D The rules so subjective on the hand ball rule it literally can go any way these days.  :f_doh:

      A) F**k West Ham
      B) Suck sh*t Moyes and
      C) I don't know the name of the onfield Ref today, but he loved us. Want him reffing every one of our games!  :D
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1638: Apr 27, 2023 07:55:10 am
      Quote from AussieRed link=topic=50157.msg2545849#msg2545849  date=1682554455
      A) F**k West Ham
      B) Suck sh*t Moyes and
      C) I don't know the name of the onfield Ref today, but he loved us. Want him reffing every one of our games!  :D

      Apparently lives in Liverpool   :f_whistle:
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1639: Apr 30, 2023 07:16:54 pm
      LiVARpoolā€¦. 😂  Come on you lot! How many think that was a red card for Jota.
      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,385 posts | 3394 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1640: Apr 30, 2023 07:28:26 pm
      LiVARpoolā€¦. 😂  Come on you lot! How many think that was a red card for Jota.

      None, skipp ducked his head down. What about skipp on Diaz?
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1641: Apr 30, 2023 07:31:37 pm
      None, skipp ducked his head down. What about skipp on Diaz?

      Both wrong by the officials.
      Lallana in Pyjamas
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 12,694 posts | 3365 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1642: Apr 30, 2023 08:26:00 pm
      Was a touch fortunate
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1643: Apr 30, 2023 08:29:06 pm

      Just a tad,  😂 donā€™t tell your mate  ( FL Red ) this though. Weā€™ll never hear the last of it.   :lmao:
      lfc across the water
      • Needs a Klopp hug...Rafa's Number 1 fan...VAR has no faults Promoter
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,863 posts | 704 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1644: May 07, 2023 03:57:19 pm
      Quote from FATKOPITE10
      None, skipp ducked his head down. What about skipp on Diaz?

      Why are you comparing different incidents? Every incident is judged on it's merits.

      Neither are a red card btw.

      When VAR was brought in, shirt pulling was one of the first things to be clamped down upon. Now it seems, short of tearing it off your opponent, it seems every ref, on and off the pitch, is willing to let it go for some reason. ???
      tezmac
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,196 posts | 913 
      • F**k the Sun F**k Murdoch F**k the press
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1645: May 07, 2023 08:00:52 pm
      Manchester United how is that not looked at again the officials are just not good enough another reason to bin VAR
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1646: May 07, 2023 08:26:19 pm
      Manchester United how is that not looked at again the officials are just not good enough another reason to bin VAR

      Iā€™m been wrong often this year when I think it was/wasnā€™t a handball. I thought it was 100% a penalty but once again I was wrong.   :lmao:
      Norfolk Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 1,165 posts | 514 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1647: May 07, 2023 08:37:16 pm
      Iā€™m been wrong often this year when I think it was/wasnā€™t a handball. I thought it was 100% a penalty but once again I was wrong.   :lmao:

      Which makes VAR a complete joke.
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1648: May 07, 2023 08:59:45 pm

      Donā€™t tell that silly kunt across the water that heā€™ll have you hung drawn and quartered   :lmao:
      andylfcynwa
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 9,341 posts | 1620 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1649: May 08, 2023 09:36:42 am
      Suppose we will get the obligatory sorry this morning , and oh it should have been a pen , our officials are totally inept .
      Don77
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 6,527 posts | 1083 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1650: May 08, 2023 10:01:49 am
      Suppose we will get the obligatory sorry this morning , and oh it should have been a pen , our officials are totally inept .

      No ... just biased at best or corrupt at worst. Nothing inept about it. Var has just opened the door to even more opportunity for bias. Because letsface it ... they answer to nobody.
      waltonl4
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 37,585 posts | 7139 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1651: May 08, 2023 11:14:33 am
      just waiting for the FA to say it will even itself out over a season. It has ruined the game for celebrating goals which in itself is a crime
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,196 posts | 734 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1652: May 08, 2023 11:27:27 am
      just waiting for the FA to say it will even itself out over a season. It has ruined the game for celebrating goals which in itself is a crime
      Nobody could argue that the endless debates over every single incident isn't tiresome and sucking the lifeblood out of the game.
      I'm sure if supporters (of all clubs) were given the vote (They won't) to either keep it or ditch it....it would be voted into history as a bad experiment. It was a better experience when ref's and linesmen just got things wrong, but we just moved on.
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,872 posts | 2693 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1653: May 08, 2023 02:10:06 pm
      No ... just biased at best or corrupt at worst. Nothing inept about it. Var has just opened the door to even more opportunity for bias. Because letsface it ... they answer to nobody.

      Hang on Don thatā€™s a bit harsh.   :lmao: Defo rose tints calling it corrupt just coz itā€™s us lot!  You lot done really well out of VAR this year. Itā€™s just totally inept from the officials which is the norm.
      higgy_sham
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 3,276 posts | 799 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1654: May 08, 2023 02:23:32 pm
      Still no word on the handball incident in the United game from our resident VAR expert?
      Don77
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 6,527 posts | 1083 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1655: May 08, 2023 02:40:56 pm
      Hang on Don thatā€™s a bit harsh.   :lmao: Defo rose tints calling it corrupt just coz itā€™s us lot!  You lot done really well out of VAR this year. Itā€™s just totally inept from the officials which is the norm.

      I wasn't referring to united Keith. I'm talking about Var in general.

      But OK, as an example ... Everton were refused a penalty for clear handball against city ... the weekend which would have seen us claw back more off a 15+ point deficit striking a vital blow ... only for it to be denied by a Manchester referee , backed up by a var ... from Manchester. Not to mention the ref that day klopps friend Mr Tierney has family who are city supporters.

      Nobody wants to question it. Nobody wants to contemplate it. But its obvious. It doesn't get mentioned on Motd ... I wonder why this is.

      As far as united go ... I don't watch other teams. I saw your result yesterday after checking the score a couple of times each half and beyond that I've no idea what happened in the game.

      Quick Reply