Trending Topics

      Next match: Fulham v LFC [Premier League] Sun 21st Apr @ 4:30 pm
      Craven Cottage

      Today is the 19th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P32 W19 D8 L5

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Fans vote for or against VAR

      VAR

      Read 238383 times
      0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
      Norfolk Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 1,165 posts | 514 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1495: Aug 15, 2022 03:51:38 pm
      Our resident var expert is compiling the weekends dossier as we speak .


      Should make good reading................. ....not.
      waltonl4
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 37,585 posts | 7139 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1496: Aug 15, 2022 04:06:18 pm
      VAR was supposed to eliminate mistakes but we have just as many talking points now as we did before VAR. We are still at the whim of a poorly trained Ref with only Offside really definitive in its correct decision making. Scrap it .
      waltonl4
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 37,585 posts | 7139 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1497: Aug 15, 2022 04:07:09 pm

      Should make good reading................. ....not.

      it will be if you like reading  a full page of crap he cant half go on.
      -LFC-
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,194 posts | 1205 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1498: Aug 15, 2022 04:34:01 pm
      Somewhere, someone across the water is preparing their spreadsheets and video files  :lmao:
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,865 posts | 2691 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1499: Aug 15, 2022 04:42:55 pm
      Somewhere, someone across the water is preparing their spreadsheets and video files  :lmao:

      It’s imminent, we all wait with bated breath.   :lmao:
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,865 posts | 2691 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1500: Aug 15, 2022 04:43:32 pm
      it will be if you like reading  a full page of crap he cant half go on.

      Sad thing is we will all read it though.  :lmao:
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,192 posts | 732 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1501: Aug 15, 2022 04:45:20 pm
      the silence coming from the VAR and the FA mob is deafening isnt it. If they cant see with their own eyes what happens 5 yards in front of them what is the point. We have lots of excellent foreign players in the league why cant we have foreign Refs ?

      B R E X I T
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,192 posts | 732 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1502: Aug 15, 2022 05:06:51 pm
      IF as is extremely likely VAR is here to stay its parameters of use need to be reset. Where the use of technology gives us a definitive answer, as with offside it would seem to be of some value. But even here with the drawn on lines etc. it's not possible to be 100% all of the time. Is it always clear when exactly the ball left the player making the pass, or what part of the body was in front, or behind a covering defender? I don't think so. To get it more accurate they would need multiple cameras recording at 60 frames per second, and they would be prohibitively expensive. Better just bin the whole experiment and rely real time judgement of refs and linesmen/women...Who we can acknowledge and accept, get some calls wrong.
      tezmac
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,194 posts | 913 
      • F**k the Sun F**k Murdoch F**k the press
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1503: Aug 15, 2022 05:07:54 pm
      For me keep the off side reviews but the rest scrap because I the reviews are open to who ever is interpreting them, just look at the Spurs game last season Kane should have been off and we should have had a nailed on penalty, at least the game would flow better
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,865 posts | 2691 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1504: Aug 15, 2022 05:41:23 pm
      But even here with the drawn on lines etc. it's not possible to be 100%

      Not sure our resident expect will agree with you,  VAR never wrong. The pulling of the hair was accidental so  therefor not a foul   :f_whistle:
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,192 posts | 732 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1505: Aug 15, 2022 05:44:06 pm
      For me keep the off side reviews but the rest scrap because I the reviews are open to who ever is interpreting them, just look at the Spurs game last season Kane should have been off and we should have had a nailed on penalty, at least the game would flow better
      Fair point...I wouldn't argue with that. One thing since its introduction that I have often found odd, is that the VAR operator calls the decision as either in front, or behind the set line(s). We never have a decision of "in line" as in exactly parallel, this is strange. Even sports like cycling, with two bikes crossing the line at speed, with technology calibrated to hundredths of a second we still get dead heats. In line is onside ....call it
      lfc across the water
      • Needs a Klopp hug...Rafa's Number 1 fan...VAR has no faults Promoter
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,863 posts | 704 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1506: Aug 19, 2022 01:51:45 pm
      Quote from Longy-Shops
      IF as is extremely likely VAR is here to stay its parameters of use need to be reset. Where the use of technology gives us a definitive answer, as with offside it would seem to be of some value. But even here with the drawn on lines etc. it's not possible to be 100% all of the time. Is it always clear when exactly the ball left the player making the pass, or what part of the body was in front, or behind a covering defender? I don't think so. To get it more accurate they would need multiple cameras recording at 60 frames per second, and they would be prohibitively expensive. Better just bin the whole experiment and rely real time judgement of refs and linesmen/women...Who we can acknowledge and accept, get some calls wrong.

      Unfortunately that's not good enough, with all that is at stake in this league. Take a look at the hair pull case at the weekend. Nobody accepts the ref got it wrong, they just question his competence, someone else called for foreign refs, and the team manager involved demands that he stay away from their games. That's what happens, nobody accepts refereeing mistakes, either on or off the pitch. I'm still bitter about decisions against us by referees from 10-20-30 years ago, and never once did I excuse them for getting it wrong.

      The offside flags are delayed for obvious reasons, which most people should understand by now. While there is an injury risk, the actual amount of injuries as a result of delayed flags, is miniscule. In any case, you play to the whistle, not the flag. It's the referee who has the authority to stop a game, not the linesman. So even if he puts the flag up, the ref still has the right to ignore him.

      Var is not an experiment to be got rid of, it's a permanent feature of elite level football in this league, and many others. So you either like it or live with it, and I feel much safer with it overseeing things in our games, than taking our chances without it. Either way, it's going nowhere.
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,865 posts | 2691 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1507: Sep 04, 2022 10:11:28 am
      Another serious error by VAR yesterday. West Ham score a legitimate goal only to be ruled a foul on keeper.  When does it stop.  :f_doh:
      andylfcynwa
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 9,341 posts | 1620 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1508: Sep 04, 2022 10:23:00 am
      At least yesterdays Fck ups will keep the one across the water busy for z few days , while the next chapter is written on how goood it is and what it’s doing for the game , worst thing that’s happened in footballl by a country mile just because you have the same idiots looking at it that used to ref and most were no fcking good at that .
      -LFC-
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,194 posts | 1205 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1509: Sep 04, 2022 10:40:14 am
      Another serious error by VAR yesterday. West Ham score a legitimate goal only to be ruled a foul on keeper.  When does it stop.  :f_doh:

      Joke of a decision that. Villa also denied a legit goal. 
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,865 posts | 2691 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1510: Sep 04, 2022 11:00:24 am
      Joke of a decision that. Villa also denied a legit goal. 

      Problem with Villa goal is that he’d already blown his whistle, get your point though very harsh.
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,192 posts | 732 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1511: Sep 04, 2022 11:09:17 am
      Is the experience of watching a game better? This should be the only question relevant to the whole VAR issue. It doesn't.... for numerous reasons all which have been discussed ad infinitum. It's just an additional procedure where the incident is judged by another (ex) referee; who as we have seen, will make the wrong call as often as the right call. So what's the point?....maybe another VAR operator to monitor the first!..obviously not!
      It's a waste of time and it's draining all the spontaneity out of the game. Of course you have to understand how and why it came about in the first place. Nearly all games now are televised, with each incident replayed over and over. So when supporters saw those pictures, it often it showed the officials had made a mistake, often quite a costly one. Answer: add another referee watching the game (miles away from the action!) to call out any clear and obvious mistake the real ref has made. The English language is often ambiguous and open to interpretation...how do you define clear, or obvious? ...you can't. so we just have another level of judgement...opinion, which is where we started.

      It has spoiled the game especially for the supporters at the game.  Admit it isn't fit for purpose and discard it.
      waltonl4
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 37,585 posts | 7139 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1512: Sep 04, 2022 11:37:51 am
      Another serious error by VAR yesterday. West Ham score a legitimate goal only to be ruled a foul on keeper.  When does it stop.  :f_doh:

      well the underlying problem of poor officals has found its way into the VAR box. We have said for many years our Refs in the EPL are sub standard unfit and lack knowledge of the game and all we have done is give them a roof over their head . As soon as a manager rightly calls them out he gets slammed by the FA cant be allowing the truth to be told
      Norfolk Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 1,165 posts | 514 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1513: Sep 04, 2022 12:00:31 pm
      VAR, what a joke. I don't care what him across the water says it really should be got rid of.

      Question, how did football manage before VAR ?  Yes, there were mistakes but there are with it complete joke and game killer.

      I await with baited breath from you know who..................... ........................ ........................ .........Not!
      HUYTON RED
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 40,089 posts | 8521 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1514: Sep 04, 2022 02:35:02 pm
      Breaking news on BBC website

       Premier League to review VAR operation with PGMOL
           

       The Premier League is to review the operation of VAR with referees' organisation PGMOL as a matter of priority.

      More to follow.     

      chats
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,288 posts | 2806 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1515: Sep 04, 2022 03:14:35 pm
      Another grim decision to rule out that Brighton goal.

      VAR, certainly the way it has been operated in the Premier League, is really turning me off football.
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,192 posts | 732 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1516: Sep 04, 2022 03:15:58 pm
      The Fun Police at it at Brighton this afternoon....get rid of VAR it's a poison in the game. Let's just learn to accept a referee decision however imperfect and move on. It's so tedious...it's nearly every game is blighted with this nonsense.
      waltonl4
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 37,585 posts | 7139 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #1517: Sep 04, 2022 03:21:25 pm
      its been outed the same people who couldnt referee are still making crappy decisions even when they are hiding away. 5 mins today for Brighton and still they left it to the Ref to check his monitor for offside.

      Quick Reply