Trending Topics

      Next match: LFC v Brighton [Premier League] Sun 31st Mar @ 2:00 pm
      Anfield

      Today is the 28th of March and on this date LFC's match record is P26 W11 D3 L12

      City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half

      Read 4435 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      HUYTON RED
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 39,947 posts | 8458 
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #23: Apr 12, 2018 05:35:07 pm
      This going to go down in the archives alongside Luis Garcia's was it, wasn't it over the line goal?

      fields of anny rd
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 17,663 posts | 1961 
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #24: Apr 12, 2018 06:15:45 pm
      Sane wasnt offside at any point when the cross initially came in. Well onside, awful call by the 24 officials involved but it made me smile at the time and still does now.
      billythered
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 10,821 posts | 4920 
      • From Doubters to Champions of the World
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #25: Apr 12, 2018 06:22:52 pm
      WHO, I MEAN WHOOO ACTUALLY GIVES
                                 A  F**k ???

      Decisions good or bad, we have all had our share, IT'S FOOTBALL, They Happen,

      Refs are Human too, they make mistakes , its acceptable, it may piss you off at times but overall we take the it on the chin and move on.


      YNWA
      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,342 posts | 3368 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #26: Apr 12, 2018 06:25:31 pm
      Amazing that mo's 'offside' goal in the first leg is now being used as an example of decisions going against citeh but there was F**k all mention of it last week, funny that eh ?
      GERNS
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 12,208 posts | 1503 
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #27: Apr 12, 2018 10:40:04 pm
      When City tried to launch a counter from one of our few excursions towards their penalty box in the first half, de Bruyne was running with the ball with Ox chasing him. With Ox being faster, he pulled alongside De Bruyne, and under threat of losing the ball, de Bruyne throws himself on the floor.
      No tackle, no pull back, no contact of note, yet debruyne gets a free kick ! WTF, no foul, just a 100% dive.
      I’m still waiting to hear a city fan of any sort, inquire why ‘the best midfielder in europe’  has to resort to diving, when, if he stayed on his feet, he could just play everyone off the park 😳

      F***ing Cheating Cnut !
      Robby The Z
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 9,034 posts | 2690 
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #28: Apr 12, 2018 11:12:47 pm
      He was legitimately OFFside. The decision was correct. We earned every bit of our win.
      Harrisimo
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 7,968 posts | 1355 
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #29: Apr 12, 2018 11:31:40 pm
      The issue with this decision, according to the Law 11 the offside rule, is as I said and that is...Did Milner intentionaly play the ball back towards the goal. The rule in Law 11 is not very clear. In this case Karius punched away a cross and it went straight at Milner.

      Now did Milner have time to play the ball intentionaly or instinctively...if the answer is no...then it must have rebounded off him accidentally...so he did not play Sane ONSIDE.

      Point is tho..did the Ass.Ref get it right in deciding that it was an accidental rebound off Milner....or did he just see Sane in an offside position and flagged for it.

      In any case looking at the replays Milner couldn't react quick enough...so the right decision was given.
      PurpleMonkey
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 10,000 posts | 1991 
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #30: Apr 12, 2018 11:52:36 pm
      The issue with this decision, according to the Law 11 the offside rule, is as I said and that is...Did Milner intentionaly play the ball back towards the goal. The rule in Law 11 is not very clear. In this case Karius punched away a cross and it went straight at Milner.

      Now did Milner have time to play the ball intentionaly or instinctively...if the answer is no...then it must have rebounded off him accidentally...so he did not play Sane ONSIDE.

      Point is tho..did the Ass.Ref get it right in deciding that it was an accidental rebound off Milner....or did he just see Sane in an offside position and flagged for it.

      In any case looking at the replays Milner couldn't react quick enough...so the right decision was given.

      It really is that simple, isn't it? You can see Milner didn't have the time to play the ball intentionally, from what I remember, it was more reflex and him sticking out a leg which rebounded to Sane.

      But you know what? The more concerning matter is how these f**king stupid ex pros (and pros) haven't a clue, and nor did the BT sport Ref pundit (can't remember the name) who just said it was a huge mistake by the ref without mentioning what you said. Could have been cleared up so easily if the rule was mentioned ;D.
      AussieRed
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,583 posts | 6643 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #31: Apr 13, 2018 01:50:34 am
      F**k City, F**k their money and F**k off to their fans

      5-1 on aggregate you Rich cu*ts!!!
      leosc
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 2,011 posts | 273 
      • Poetry in motion!
      Re: City's Disallowed Goal at the end of 1st Half
      Reply #32: Apr 13, 2018 03:14:27 am
      F**k City, F**k their money and f**k off to their fans

      5-1 on aggregate you Rich Cu*ts!!!

      This!

      Quick Reply