It's your assertion, it's up to you to prove it.
Remember, Swab, I am using your mindset/logic.
Klopp chooses Fabinho over Hendo and Wijnaldum as the 6 when both are on the pitch . Fabinho is obviously doing something right and to a high level, otherwise he would not have trusted Fabinho and played either Wijnaldum or Hendo there, right? So you are wrong on all accounts, just like everyone who criticised Hendo was wrong because Klopp played him there week in, week out!
No, you ignore those parts of his game to pursue an agenda.
A twitter agenda.
No agenda, just calling out your BS for everyone to see. And I rather read twitter than your tumblr!!
Yes, it has.
A blind man can see he's weighing his options, and picking the safer pass.
Just like Henderson.
Maybe it really is an instruction, apart from when you see Henderson do it, then you say it's because he's not "technical".
A blind man can see Fabinho distributes the ball differently to Hendo with Fabinho positive.
Ever think players get things wrong, and that's why they need coaching?
No, obviously not.
I think Fabinho gets it wrong, just like Hendo, Firmino, Salah, Mane etc. Remember, I am just using your logic against you, that is all.
Again with the bullshit, and showing a complete lack of understanding.
First few games, Wijnaldum played deep.
Then Fabinho came in, but had Wijnaldum as a "minder" in a double 6.
Since then, Milner, Wijnaldum, Henderson and Fabinho hve all played deepest.
Why? So they can rotate during a game.
But who is considered the main 6 for the majority of matches now?
It is evidently clear for all to see.
Nope, it's a matter of getting the right players, with the right mentality, and an ability to put into practice what the coach teaches them.
Klopp said last week that Milner is still developing.
Seriously, where are we going with this?
Every time you post it's easy to see you don't understand.
Trnfer thread "we need a wide player"
Except we need a forward who caln play across the line.
Yhis wide player bollocks is more twitter bollocks
It's not bollocks though, is it? You assciocate players such as, Salah, Mane, Hazard, Neymar, Asensio, Sane, Sterling etc as wide players, where as your Aguero, Lewandowski, D.Costa etc as strikers, why? because they are playing to their main strengths.
Ideally, you want someone capable of playing across the line , but you won't find many players capable of playing to the same level across the front line. Not even Firmino can perform to Salah's level on the right or Manes on the left, just like you wouldn't see Mane performa to Firmino's level as the 9.
I think it's viable to question what needs more cover in our front line, a 9 or wide areas? And imo, I would say getting more of a high level natural wide player to cover/challenge Mane and Salah is more important.
Isn't considered by who?
Yeah, all the coaches who pick him do so because he has no technique.
What a load of bollocks.
I am sure it's considered by many many football fans and professionals. I bet you don't even think Barca are a more technical side than us, right? And who says he has no technique? Just face it, he just isn't as technical as some players, nor will he be considered a technical player.
Do you think Kante can be considered a technical player then?
Henderson plays like Henderson.
He can do a variety of roles, and do them well.
You're just chucking out names you think sound good.
Every player can play a variety of roles, but the question is, to what level? Hendo will never reach Pjanic or Verratti's ball playing levels because he isn't as technical, his main strengths are his physical attributes, therefore he is not considered a technical player, right?
Nope, the first time you brought him up was to post utter nonsense about a "double pivot" which you clearly didn't understand, and still don't.
This is just another one of your blags like "I don't do twitter"
Then you post a load of links to twitter after the Barca match.
I don't think I said I don't do twitter, but what I said was, I do not engage or seek out football debates. My only form of discussion is here and I tend to read another forum.
And excuse me, Swab, aren't you the one who pretty much confirmed we have been using a double pivot? Remember when you said a double pivot is where you have a DM and a box-box? Didn't you also say later on that Wijnaldum was more the DM and Fabinho the more offensive (pretty much a boxer) in a post match thread? I will have to find it someday!
Anyway, at least with Racer, he gave a respectable and sensible reason why he didn't think we used a double pivot, but yours...
And P.Nevile (the guy who has more experience and information than you, therefore he knows more than you, right?) showed we used a 4231 instead of a 433 . And even when I showed you the post match where Klopp said we used a double 6/double pivot, you still rejected it, so I had to bring in the genius of P.Neville to help you!!
Remind me again, what is the different between a double 6 and double pivot?
We are clearly wasting each other's time, so let's draw the line here and use your own logic against you and agree that you are wrong because Klopp picks Fabinho as the 6 over Hendo and Wijnaldum?