Trending Topics

      Next match: Sporting v LFC [Friendly] Thu 25th Jul @ 1:05 am
      Yankee Stadium, New York, USA

      Today is the 22nd of July and on this date LFC's match record is P7 W3 D2 L2

      Chelsea face transfer ban

      Read 530 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 8,483 posts | 2490 
      Chelsea face transfer ban
      Feb 22, 2019 09:55:48 am
      Sarri reckons he will be Chelsea manager for a long time, has he started with them on football manager ?

      This might be a factor 🤣🤣🤣

      https://twitter.com/bbcsport/status/1098880491552411648?s=21
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 5,463 posts | 617 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #1: Feb 22, 2019 10:17:32 am

      Wow wow wow  :roll:
      Basically rules them out winning league next years. Could also mean Hazard sure to leave now this summer.
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 8,483 posts | 2490 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #2: Feb 22, 2019 10:21:48 am
      Wow wow wow  :roll:
      Basically rules them out winning league next years. Could also mean Hazard sure to leave now this summer.

      They’ll get plundered in my opinion.

      Writing off a(nother) season is a long time for players like Hazard & Kante in particular.

      Double deal to Real anyone?

      Jorginho back to Italy?
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 5,463 posts | 617 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #3: Feb 22, 2019 10:32:34 am
      They’ll get plundered in my opinion.

      Writing off a(nother) season is a long time for players like Hazard & Kante in particular.

      Double deal to Real anyone?

      Jorginho back to Italy?

      Hoping  Kante comes to us with a bit of luck. Could well be a mass exodus of players along with the manager which incidentally may go after Cup Final this weekend 
      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 10,314 posts | 1817 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #4: Feb 22, 2019 11:08:45 am
      Chelsea only have the 41 players out on loan, may have to do the unthinkable and actually use one or two of them.
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 23,819 posts | 3425 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #5: Feb 22, 2019 12:27:41 pm
      They will appeal the ban, and possibly be able to make transfers this summer. They'll stock up so they can survive the two year ban. Question is, if they don't make top 4, it may not matter, no one will want to come to them.

      Now if we could just get City docked some points for their blatant circumvention of FFP.
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 5,463 posts | 617 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #6: Feb 22, 2019 12:31:09 pm


      Now if we could just get City docked some points for their blatant circumvention of FFP.

      I don't think it's over with them yet, think there still looking into it. However, dock the points off next year not this year please.  :f_whistle:
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 23,819 posts | 3425 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #7: Feb 22, 2019 12:38:44 pm
      I don't think it's over with them yet, think there still looking into it. However, dock the points off next year not this year please.  :f_whistle:

      That's fine, will make it easier to win back to back titles that way.
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 5,463 posts | 617 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #8: Feb 22, 2019 12:47:52 pm
      That's fine, will make it easier to win back to back titles that way.

       ;D ;D ;D
      waltonl4
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 26,898 posts | 3649 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #9: Feb 22, 2019 12:53:26 pm
      Chelsea only have the 41 players out on loan, may have to do the unthinkable and actually use one or two of them.

      how is that going to work? there needs to be far better regulation of players and which club they play for . Having 41 players on loan is just ridiculous. Poor Chelsea the wheels are starting to fall off.
      JD
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 34,630 posts | 4171 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #10: Feb 22, 2019 02:27:02 pm
      Chelsea only have the 41 players out on loan, may have to do the unthinkable and actually use one or two of them.

      Plus no doubt the 'sentence' will be reduced on appeal.  Not much to see here.  Worst case scenario is that they can't buy anyone in the summer, Hazard gets off (He's very inconsistent anyway in my view) and they have to wait until January to splash Ambramovich's cash.

      Fines and pretend transfer bans don't hit Europe's major clubs hard enough.  They need to face points deductions or blocked entry to European competitions.  That applies to everyone.  And they can start with Man City's financial doping.  £250M+ in commercial revenue my arse - as if anyone believes that's legit.
      Magillionare
      • Official LFC Reds Sig Maker. Lives on Sesame Street.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,845 posts | 2314 
      • Hold on a minute, John Wayne hasn't arrived yet.
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #11: Feb 22, 2019 06:21:59 pm
      Bye bye Hazard, bye bye Sari, bye bye Roman.

      Hope the club plummets into midtable obscurity, f**k them.
      Gill95
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,316 posts | 374 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #12: Feb 22, 2019 07:04:36 pm
      Bye bye Hazard, bye bye Sari, bye bye Roman.

      Hope the club plummets into midtable obscurity, f**k them.

      Hope city is next. Scummy corrupt cu*ts.

      Don't know how much wages they outsource these fucks.
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1370 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #13: Feb 23, 2019 11:49:29 am
      Plus no doubt the 'sentence' will be reduced on appeal.  Not much to see here.  Worst case scenario is that they can't buy anyone in the summer, Hazard gets off (He's very inconsistent anyway in my view) and they have to wait until January to splash Ambramovich's cash.

      Fines and pretend transfer bans don't hit Europe's major clubs hard enough.  They need to face points deductions or blocked entry to European competitions.  That applies to everyone.  And they can start with Man City's financial doping.  £250M+ in commercial revenue my arse - as if anyone believes that's legit.
      City using loopholes, parent company of city probably has a sibling company bankrolling sponsorship deals and the accounts kept separate from MCFC, since the sponsorship is merely a proxy it's skirting around the rules. Believe their sponsorship is 400m now.
      molbys belly
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,317 posts | 81 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #14: Feb 23, 2019 06:32:25 pm
      Couldnt happen to a nicer club 🤣 f**k them
      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 10,314 posts | 1817 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #15: Feb 23, 2019 06:35:19 pm
      City using loopholes, parent company of city probably has a sibling company bankrolling sponsorship deals and the accounts kept separate from MCFC, since the sponsorship is merely a proxy it's skirting around the rules. Believe their sponsorship is 400m now.

      And now talk of an illegal payment by city to an agent of jadon sancho by city when he was 14
      RedPuppy
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 17,377 posts | 1929 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #16: Feb 24, 2019 11:30:26 am
      BBC gossip page...
      Barcelona are ready to bid 110m euros (£95m) for Atletico Madrid midfielder Saul Niguez, 24, who has also been linked with Chelsea. (AS)

      waltonl4
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 26,898 posts | 3649 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #17: Feb 24, 2019 11:47:53 am
      And now talk of an illegal payment by city to an agent of jadon sancho by city when he was 14

      maybe followed by another payment to make that payment go away
      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 10,314 posts | 1817 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #18: Feb 24, 2019 12:23:52 pm
      maybe followed by another payment to make that payment go away

      Citeh say they won't comment on out of context information gained in an apparently illegal manner
      AussieRed
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 15,580 posts | 3193 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #19: Feb 25, 2019 05:25:40 am
      Bye bye Hazard, bye bye Sari, bye bye Roman.

      Hope the club plummets into midtable obscurity, f**k them.

      I can't see how it's bye bye Hazzard now. Surely they will do everything now to keep him, probably double his wages. I don't see him going anywhere.
      Magillionare
      • Official LFC Reds Sig Maker. Lives on Sesame Street.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,845 posts | 2314 
      • Hold on a minute, John Wayne hasn't arrived yet.
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #20: Feb 25, 2019 05:16:37 pm
      I can't see how it's bye bye Hazzard now. Surely they will do everything now to keep him, probably double his wages. I don't see him going anywhere.

      I think he’ll demand to move at this stage and run down his contract
      Kopite78
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,957 posts | 1973 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #21: Feb 25, 2019 05:23:15 pm
      I can't see how it's bye bye Hazzard now. Surely they will do everything now to keep him, probably double his wages. I don't see him going anywhere.

      They signed Pulisic to replace Hazard so could still see him leaving regardless if he demands it. Which I believe he will
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 23,819 posts | 3425 
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #22: Feb 25, 2019 05:24:02 pm
      I think he’ll demand to move at this stage and run down his contract

      Oh yea, he's gone for sure.
      AussieRed
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 15,580 posts | 3193 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone
      Re: Chelsea face transfer ban
      Reply #23: Feb 25, 2019 09:44:29 pm
      I think he’ll demand to move at this stage and run down his contract

      They signed Pulisic to replace Hazard so could still see him leaving regardless if he demands it. Which I believe he will


      Time will tell lads. F**k, you never know he might end up playing for us, seeing as how much he loves Anfield and playing on the surface.  ;)

      Quick Reply