The title of this thread : Is English officiating corrupt? was always a strange title because as far as I can see this has been interpreted as, Are officials biased and corrupt specifically against Liverpool? I would be very surprised if they were for a number of reason's....but My stance has always been based on a lack of impartial evidence. Can I prove there isn't bias or corruption? No, because you can't disprove a negative, I can't disprove there isn't a distant Universe with a Galaxy in which there is an exact mirror of planet Earth....only millions of years in the past.... or the future, where there is an exact version of yourself thinking and doing exactly all the things you do, and have done in your life up to now...but theoretically it is possible.
If there was systematic corruption in place against Liverpool FC...or any other club, it would be picked up and exposed, first by the club itself. The club has never said it suspects any maliciousness from any officials, it has, as all clubs do, call poor decisions out, as after the Spurs debacle.
Pretty much everything in life is for a reason, and a lot of stuff takes a lot of effort and planning. So what possible reason could exist for Liverpool FC to be targeted and singled out to be deliberately suppressed?..What motive?...Who could gain from it?...Who could organise it and set it up...How long would it be in place for....20 years...250 years?...The whole topic is nonsense. And as you say the thread needs binning, it's an insult to reason and logic.
If the topic was: Do some clubs navigate around the rules?...well we know they do, and depending on the profile of the club, they may be found guilty and punished.