Is it really so much about how much you win though or are we purely talking in the sense of evaluating the player they are/were and matching it up against the skills/athleticism/technique etc of others?
Because pretty much all the guys from the 70s/80s won more than what Mo & Stevie have.....Hansen, Souness, Whelan, Kennedy, Beardsley, Neal etc and the guys from the mid-late 80s never had the chance to win any European cups because of the ban on English teams.
If we're talking purely from a players perspective and everything involved in the game, I don't see how a Salah can be better than a Molby or Barnes.
« Last Edit: Sep 04, 2024 03:57:40 pm by The-AllMightyReds »
Logged