Good point that, if there whole point with Luis was it was the act of biting, there were never pictures of bite marks, he was punished on the act of biting so what's the difference?
All water under the bridge now like.
Water under the bridge indeed mate.
Irrespective Costa was on camera applying a love bite/vampire bite/toothy bite on an opposing player, all bites of one kind or another no matter what interpretation is applied.
The FA interpretation of these incidents is of course beyond scrutiny, any inquiry into the FA's credibility is met with swingeing disciplinary action.
Been said before - no better example of hypocrisy and a law unto themselves; the Chelsea team and supporters shelter beneath the same umbrella.
Logged
