He writes a column for them, plenty on here know about it!
Have you stopped watching BBC, ITV, Sky News as well as any other channel his F***ing ugly gob appears on? I've learnt to ignore most of what falls out of his gob and not to get too wound up by the pr**k.
Stopped reading the Daily fail years ago and it has always been anti-scouse.
Also you're moaning about a lot of posters off the offal posting links from that now extinct sh*te who are more than likely from all parts of the world, were you personally angry when Carragher, Gerrard, Owen and others from the club over the years gave exclusives to the NOTW?
Just asking!
To be honest mate, I read BBC. I stream ITV. I live in Germany. Hence this. Sky is just sh*te enough.
I am just curious because, our vengance is against the man who wrote LIES on a paper and they should go hand in hand. Just because he left the rag doesnt mean we accept it as a paper. Nor read his articles and posts on the daily mail because he no longer is associated with the rag.
And yes. I was/is pissed off when players give exclusives to the rag or anything associated with it - present and extinct papers included. And I still cant get over the fact that they are pardoned when a certain ex-manager wasnt and is still slated off till today.
My 2 cents.
Hate the Tory F***ing rag with a vengeance, the witch Thatcher is alive and well in it's poisonous pages.
The difference between the Mail and the shitrag we hate is the Mail don't display as many tits on it's pages but make no mistake they have as many on the payroll if not more.
Amen to that mate. Cant really find a fault with what you mentioned about the bi*ch.
Not a single paper worth reading nowadays, they all have their own slant on news. All opinion mongers now, not newspapers, I want to be given the information and then make my own mind up, not be spoon fed, sadly a lot of people just seem to be content with a newspaper that broadly agrees with their POV. And if you really need your football fix, just go read the transfer rumour thread and wade through the 90% horseshit content that is spawned by journalists, bloggers and hacks.
Its not a question of selecting one paper because the others give out sh*t information. Nor is it anything against the media or the fact that news articles are prejudiced and partial as they are printed.
My question is with the paper that printed LIES upon the instructions of a certain someone who works for another paper. How difficult is that to understand? Its not just the transfer rumour or the articles posted here or on any other forum. Its about the boycott of a paper/person until justice to the families is done.
Logged
