Bollocks.
Arsenal produce less academy kids than most sides in the League. They simply pinch kids from other clubs (Fabregas from Barcelona, Walcott from Southampton, Ramsey from Cardiff, Van Persie from Feyenoord, Vela from whichever Mexican side he came from, Clichy from whichever French side he came from) and then they try and make out they have a great set of kids. They don't, they just pinch players from other clubs.
With the exception of Ashley Cole, they haven't produced a real regular in their side in the last decade. Their great youth system was in effect in the late 80s early 90s with Merson, Adams, Parlour, Davis (probably a regular by the mid 80s to be fair), Rocastle all breaking through.
Rubbish
How many of the pinched and stolen players went straight into the first team? Bottom line? Liverpool FC has spent more than Arsenal in the past six years we still claim that they still have a better team than us?
And while we are on the topic, Where did Pacheco, and all the other young lads come from? Our Academy?
Their 25-man squad; most spent their youth years in Arsenal
Could not agree more.
Look at some of their starting 11 this season Almunia, Sagna, Vermalen, Konscielny/Squilaci, Rosicky,Nasri, Arshavin, Van Persie, Chamakh were all purchased as allready experienced players at their respective clubs. That would only leave Song, Denilson, Gibbs, Fabregas, Clichy and Walcott the last 3 who were poached from other clubs.
Nasir was a youth player much like Pacheco; he was getting to be some sort of an impact sub at Marseilleand developed before Arsenal bought him; Chamackh came on a free transfer.
Moreover, if any of the Arsenal players mentioned was at Liverpool FC, as long as they're not Torres or Gerrard, they would be labelled as sh*t.
« Last Edit: Sep 29, 2010 06:48:04 am by solodee »
Logged