Yeah I think so.
With the way they go on about them
They're alright to me as well, I'm.very much in the 3rd option myself
The thing that used to get me were the accusations of syphoning money out of the club.
I could see clearly in the accounts that they weren't, and I found it pretty frustrating, but also understandable after the H&G fiasco.
I did a lot of reading about Henry and his sports group, and it was clear to me the (the group) were nothing like the 2 shysters, and were in fact, the complete opposite.
They made some mistakes early on, but they rectified those mistakes very quickly.
They've listened to supporter groups when they've made a boner as well.
In Mike Gordon, we've got a bloke who is committed to the club, and became FSG's 2nd largest shareholder (after Henry) just so he could take a bigger stake, having been bitted by the Liverpool bug.
IMO there are few better owners around.
Yes, of course you've got the oligarchs and oil billionaires, but I'd question if they are good for the long term future of any club, or the game in general.
Some of the sticks people use to try and beat them with are a bit ridiculous to be honest.
I wasn't surprised to see the usual posters come in here to try and say it's all down to Klopp after we win a title, but I would question what they hoped to achieve by coming out with some pretty strange stuff while we were still celebrating the title.
Anyway, I've rambled on long enough, suffice to say, as someone once said, they are a safe pair of hands, and that'll do me.