What hasn't changed and never will is the business anthem of feeding an investment to achieve maximum profit margins!!
Is that âprofitâ that is used by the club to reinvest on players ?
FSG's apparent lack of faith in the asset that is LFC has seen this term abandoned because of injuries, to be more precise a lack of quality back up to replace vital players, quality back up that could not be acquired because a sell to buy option was not available.
Have we not consistent spent on players since they became owners ? Do you still expect the club to have the same level of player sat on the bench waiting to come in in case of injury - there is only one club that can achieve that , the one backed by the oil billionaire to the tune of ÂŁ1bn net
Was JĂźrgen expected to sell his worldly goods to pay for top class replacements?, were the supporters supposed to have whip round?
Klopp have never âhadâ to sell a player to bring in a replacement? The process is simple - Klopp spends the money the club earns after the bills are paid 🤷ââď¸
The owners are happy the manager's genius keeps the market value in the black, top 4 will do the job for them.
How many managers would be prepared to operate on a purely business proposition?
Donât most managers operate under the same level ? Spending the money the club earns unless there is an oil billionaire who is happy to cook the books.
I donât recall once the owners have ever said they are only happy with just top 4 🤷ââď¸ . The owners will be happy that the manager and his staff keeps the club competing for the biggest trophies whilst working within the financial model of the club. If Klopp wasnât happy with that would he not just walk away 🤷ââď¸
In fact - what is it in layman terms expect from football owners in the current climate ?
The club is in its best position since the late 80âs yet it seems to be not good enough
« Last Edit: May 27, 2021 02:05:55 pm by Lallana in Pyjamas »
Logged