Who's getting hot under the collar?
Certainly not me.
Saying that is just another one of those silly internet things that people do when they can't answer a simple question or have no case to put forth.
Frankly, it's just complete silliness, as is the habit of taking one part of a post and using it out of context to try and "prove" something which doesn't actually exist.
Okay, I will humour you.
Groningen; took the club to arbitration to force a move
Not the first player to do it and wont be the last, but he didn't bite someone or do anything on the pitch to force a move now did he, something that would hamper his teams chances of winning.
As it goes, Suarez lost the case for a move to be forced but straight after it he was sold when Ajax doubled their offer so it suggests they were always prepared to sell him given the right offer.
Ajax; bit a player, got a big move
Bit a player whilst playing for Ajax in mid Novermber. Left Ajax at the end of January. He only wanted to leave Ajax once De Boer took over the managerial reigns in December and stripped him of the captaincy (a month after the biting incident). So biting a player was hardly something he done deliberately to get a bigger move elsewhere now is it lad, no matter how you want to dress it up.
In fact biting a player is less likely to get you a move to a big club, no teams were really in for him then so a bigger team would hardly have thought "yes! he's bit a player, getting a nice ban, lets go and sign him".
I have nothing else to say on the matter as I feel I said all I needed to in my earlier post, I have nothing else to answer from your post because like I said, I feel it's all covered in the earlier post. You can continue if you wish though.
Logged