We like to look down our nose at these nouveau riche upstart little clubs, consoling ourselves with the idea that they are cheating as a way to compensate for our failure to compete at the highest level. "It's not fair" the battle cry of the petulant child, yet most of them would be happy enough if we had a sugar-daddy instead of a prudent, sensible businessman who lives within the clubs' means.
Here comes Mr High and Mighty slamming anyone who frowns upon heavy spending.
Without knowing me or my attitude towards spending (which you should after the millions of posts i made during the H$G and FSG takeover) i do not want a sugar daddy, and i stated millions of times that i didn't want that Chinese bid to happen because they were perceived as a sugar daddy. I want a club that is sustainable and able to generate money to be able to grow on it's own.
FSG have spent roughly 30m net. That is on the back of both new and pre-existing deals in place that is allowing the club to spend.
I don't want a squad full of overpaid (fees and wages) players because you lose respectability and sell your morals for money.
And i'm petulant? Says the one who shows criticism masked in sarcasm
Logged