To add to the debate on the stadium I agree with JD. Funding will come from both naming rights (if it's Stanley Park), sponsors (if it's redevelopment) and some sort of loan.
The main issue is getting the decision right. The cost of redevelopment could end up more than Stanley Park, as we will lose a naming rights partner plus the additional funds from not selling Anfield and the land owned around it for development.
That's how Arsenal have managed to pay back their loan so quickly. Although not as quickly as they wanted due to the housing markets crashing.
It wouldn't surprise me if NESV have been waiting to see what happens in the City, with the Peel Holdings development, as this could have a massive impact on their plans
The lack of serious match day revenue over the last 20 years has cost us far more than being out of the CL for the last couple of seasons.
There will be money available for transfers in the summer regardless of the Stadium issue as there is still cash in the bank from last summers sales, less outgoings in wages for a season, sponsor money and player sales from this summer.
Logged