We are fitter than most teams which is great, but another great thing about us at the moments is that if a couple of players get injured, the system is flexible for us to replace them. Injuring players is always going to be a disadvantage but I don't think it would be the same level of disadvantage as last year - if one of our players was injured, it would have been difficult to replace them considering the formation we played.
The ability to chop and change now and then will make us fresher than most, making our fit team look even more fit. Man City looked a lot more tired yesterday than us - also important to note their average squad age is about 6 years older than us so their recovery times aren't going to be as great as ours and even if they tried a pressing game, it wouldn't be as good as our young stars.
As much as it pains me to say it, I don't think it would be wise for Rodgers to accommodate Gerrard back in the side. Henderson and Lucas's form suffered with Gerrard alongside, and I honestly don't think we would have won yesterday's game with Gerrard playing. Allen put in a man of the match performance, with his pressing and penetration shielding the defence and linking up with attacks. With Gerrard there, he doesn't have the legs, so we would have suffered majorly in defence and attack if he had played.
It sounds cold I know, but this is about pruning the team - cutting the old dead branches to allow the tree to flourish, and that is sadly what is going to have to happen by omitting Gerrard from the starting line up. Rodgers holds all the cards in this aspect, so he must not bow to sentimentality - a dangerous thing that has held us back at times in the clubs history (e.g. Shankly holding into his players when they were past his primed). As sad as this is, for the sake of the team and the club, we must look forward, not back.
« Last Edit: Mar 02, 2015 08:17:06 pm by Son Of A Gun »
Logged