What part donāt you understand?
Ox injury was a massive traumatic one that couldnāt have been foreseen. There clearly was no no prior damage concerning.
In Nabilās case there is.
It really isnāt that complicated and clearly not a valid comparison.
An what don't you understand about the word "possible"... Fekir had surgery to fit the problem, it may never re-occur again
The Ox's career has been marred by injury. He had been out for some 510 days and missed two season + of games (81 in total) with injuries from 2012/13 season - 2016/17, and that was before he became a Liverpool player
To give that some perspective Daniel Sturridge has missed since 2008/09 season - 2016/17 some 573 games (537 if you discount the illness 12 days; and a Virus Infection 14 days) and has missed almost three whole seasons, some 106 games
Please note that in both cases I have not counted injuries and missed games of either the 2017/18 season or the 2018/19 seasonhttps://www.transfermarkt.com/daniel-sturridge/verletzungen/spieler/47082 Despite having a shorter a flight career than Sturridge, AOC has been on the injury list only 27 days shorter than Sturridge before Liverpool signing him...
To me that is f**king incredible that we should spend money on AOC given his injury record yet Fekir with only a "Possible" Knee concern, have had corrective surgery (2015/16) and since that times has only had 58 days out with two injuries to his Knee, one keeping him out for 23 (16/17) days and a Bruised Knee (17/18) keeping him out for 35 days...
Now if for some other reason Klopp/LFC did not want him, that fine by me, But if it was because of
"Possible concerns about his Knee" that to me, considering they sign The Ox is Bullshit, and rings more true to do with money than the injury concerns.
You just except the bull they feed you without questioning it...
Another victory for the FSG spin Manchine
« Last Edit: Feb 20, 2019 11:55:43 am by The Real Donavan Ried »
Logged