Except I didn't call him an idiot did I? What I said was "Well yes you actually do have to explain it unless you want to come across as an idiot." the key word there being unless and I maintain that anyone who refutes an argument with an insult or sly dig without countering it, is an idiot.
BTW if we get a 4th top striker, why on earth do you think they would not play plenty of games, it would simply be the same as our midfield where we rotate players into and out of the starting XI as per their form and fitness. Do you perhaps think that our midfielders are pissed off that there are more than 3 of them or defenders that there are more than 4 defenders??
The simple truth is that we have no adequate backup for our forwards, despite his very valuable goals Origi is not even close to the level of Sadio, Bobby or MO and Brewster is a completely unknown quantity at this time.
IF we can acquire another forward of a similar level o our current front three then I think we will walk the league next year if not then we will lose again, probably by a bigger margin because no way do we go another season without any major or lengthy injury to our front three.
Man do you like to move the goalsticks or what? I've said more than once I'm fine with rotation. The discussion had been about "cover" for our starting forwards. Even here you say we have no adequate backup (what does divock have to do If winning the champions league isn't enough?).
So if now you are saying we should spend big on a 4th forward who play a similar amount to the current three starters, well maybe, but that isn't how ive always understood the term "cover."
But the topic/target moves a lot with you, doesn't it? and btw, you do in essence call Walt an idiot.
Logged