The first scabs bought then sold top class players.
The 2nd scabs concentrate on selling them.
The first lot visited more often.
We actually did better on the pitch under the previous scum.
So all the discn of FSG vs G&H is relative.
FSG are more successful at holding onto the club. But we've seen much more asset losses under them.
Both of em are shits. Both of them are ONLY interested in the money. Both of them think us fans are a bunch of gullible, fleecable twits.
As much as H&G get a bad press I think they did come with an intention to win, they just tried to do it all on borrowed money so it collapsed around them. I don't believe their intentions were to put us in the situation they left us in I believe the financial crisis and extremely poor judgement did that.
In comparison to the current investment group their intentions are being played out perfectly, they came with a plan to maximise their gain at our expense and they're loving watching the £££'s grow. They don't come because the football doesn't interest them at all, they make a token gesture at which they should be boo'd in my opinion. Linda tweeting about Anfield as if she gives the steam off her sh*te about it.
Based on intentions I'd prefer H & G, based on financial security we have perfect owners, based on anything to do with stuff we actually pay our money for our current owners are completely disconnected and disinterested. They'll milk us for every penny they can and then never mention another word about Liverpool. Fan ownership with clubs retaining individual rights to screen their football rather than selling it off and a drip down feed of that money to grass roots level football is the 'vision' I'd love for our game. Right now it feels too much like we're all lining up to pay our money into a hedge fund without any percentage in return, talk about being sold a bad deal.
Logged