It's not just that. Using two out-and-out strikers was forced upon us, and it worked with spectacular success, almost winning us the title. We loose a Striker and so he again reverts back to the one up front in all subsequent transfer windows despite it being proven time and again that one up front doesn't give us enough goals to win anything. In each season it's been employed by him we've failed to finish in the top four. Given the success we had with two mobile, pacey strikers running rings around opposition defences, it beggers belief that we've abandoned that style of play so any criticism of Rodgers in regards to the system and transfers is justified right now.
This is more of a general comment than directed at you specifically, but the consensus seems to be along the lines of, when we play two or more upfront, we "don't know how to defend".
When we play one upfront, we're "too defensive". Which is it?
There's a lot of posters coming out of the woodwork today, starved of bad results for the past three weeks, (some of whom got going before we got back to the centre circle after the second goal), and they will make the most of the next two weeks, however nothing they say is going to make any difference. Rodgers will stay for at least the next 34 league games, so they better get used to it.
I don't know how to best sum up this result, except to say that hopefully that's the opposition's day out here covered for at least the next 52 years.
Logged