All 3 major Group B game changing decisions correct imo.
Foul in box of Portugal game = Penalty
Handball in box of Iran game = Penalty (Ball hits raised arm of defender)
Onside in Spain game = Goal
Even without VAR, Handballs can be, and have been given these days for the arm in an unnatural position. The defender has his arm already up when the ball hits it. That can count as a handball offence. You can't con a camera so with VAR, a defender won't get away with that.
The sceptics couldn't lose on it though. If it's given, they say it's not a penalty. If it isn't given, they say the refs are "biased towards the big teams". Well the so-called big team in the game had a game changing decision against them. But that's why we have VAR, to get decisions correct, regardless whether it's for a big team or a weaker team.
For tv purposes, I would like to see the microphones opened up between the VAR and the onfield ref during an onfield review, for greater transparency. The conversation between them is all in English, so there's no issues with language. Other than that, I'm very happy with VAR, and want more of it across the board. This is not a trial, this is the real thing, and in a couple of years it will be the norm, probably extended to include corners, throw ins, second yellows, etc etc.
Now a referee has more than "one look" at an incident available to him. The handball incident took a bit longer than normal so far at the tournament, but it's injury time of the last game of a group and the stakes are high. So we must have the correct decision, however long it takes.
Logged