Show me proof detonators did that. If you can, then I will say no more.
But nothing ive seen says that is the case at all, and frankly its insulting to all involved that things like that are said.
BigV
You have made a number of points already in this thread; I've tried to deal with each of them. If I'm talking bollocks tell me why. It's been a while since so I'll refresh (for my sake as well as yours). It starts on page 4. Within those pages I've also explained everything that Gow put to me so of course bring up any points there that you think I may be incorrect on.
1) You suggested that OBL had taken responsibility for the attacks. I suggested not. If he has taken responsibility show me when and I'll consider the evidence. OBL's involvement is not by the way crucial to my scientific evidence of a controlled demolition.
2) You said you didn't have blind faith in the official theory or wtte. If you don't have blind faith where is your evidence/what makes you so sure? If it is that you totally trust government versions of events then we can discuss that
3) You pointed out that I am also showing blind faith in other people's opinions. I pointed out that I have verified calculations made and reached my own conclusions based on a 18 year career in Physics (including postgrad degree and degree).
4) You asked did I join this just to belittle everyone with my superior knowledge. I can assure you this is not the case but I did accept my tone may be wrong at times. I'm an insensitive bloke, I'm afraid! I would not feel superior to anyone who does buy the official theory-I was one of those people 2 years ago.
5) You have said it it was offensive to families of the bereaved. I gave you links where family members were calling for a re-investigation. Many of them (but admittedly not all) are on the side of 9/11 sceptics.
And now you've asked for proof of detonation. I think I've done that already.
1) free fall collapse of WTC7
2) Professors Harrit and Jones' paper where they showed explosive unexploded chips were present in the World Trade Center dust.
The 10 minute presentation that Shabs suggested gives you the characteristics of a controlled demolition and then considers explains how WTC7's collapse matches those characteristics.
His second video is WTC7 worker Barry Jennings RIP giving witness of explosions in WTC7 before an office fire?/final detonations caused its global collapse. Can you explain these explosions or is BJ bullsh"tting?
KiK then shows that the US government was capable of such an act.
Put the pieces together and what do you conclude?
Finchie