Thats the thing tho. No one knows before we sign them. A signings is always a risk no matter whom you sign. If you want to stay at top then you need to take the risks of signings the players. In the future we will waste the money on signings, and thats something we as a club needs to accept if we want to win. Im not presenting a new idea here, its tested and done by great teams over and over again. The right player is a myth. There are alot of players out there that will improve our squad. We all are probably disagree on the players but there are players out there and i bet everything i own that JK too has players in the head whom he would like to have in the team.
They are taking risks - signing Nunez for his fee is a risk but we have shown over the last 5/6 years that we donât waste money
When a club is running to a self sufficient model then you really do need to be careful when you do spend and you have to make sure you are confident of the player
We spent fortunes on the likes of Carroll , Markovic , Benteke etc - a club canât afford to waste that level of money
We as a club have to be near perfect when it comes to transfers. If we spend ÂŁ50mil on a player it needs to work out - we donât have the luxury of just going out and getting another one when it doesnât
Itâs a tough game and itâs one we have done very well recently
And yes Klopp will have players he wants and they will look to get them
I didnt not know about Villa and everton and their losses but how do we only have 19.2 millions as a net spend average for last five seasons? surely we can do better then that?
Itâs not a simple as just looking at an average per season - the last 5 seasons the income has fluctuated hugely for a number of reasons. Last season for example we had a net spend of ÂŁ50mil
The year before it was ÂŁ60mil
The year before we made a profit of ÂŁ30mil
Got to look at each season in its own right
It doesnât take into account contact extensions etc which include signing on fees
Logged