Listen sir, I've been watching Liverpool since 1981 and I'm quite a good judge of what type of player makes the grade at Liverpool, Maxi doesn't in my opinion. I think his ball control is very poor and his link up play is below average for a Liverpool player.
My opinion is not based on how I look at football, it's how I look at Maxi. Just because he's had a good spell under Kenny doesn't mean I rate the lad. Our opinions differ but I will not stoop to your childish depths and make sarcastic managerial comments about you as that would just be rising to your bait.
In all honesty I have not questioned your knowledge of football during this debate or any other, yet you chose to question mine, I wonder why that was?.
Jog on.
I just made vanilla and pear flavoured porridge for breakfast which makes me equally as qualified to be a good judge of character of who will make the grade at Liverpool. If you're confused, the point I'm making is that how long you've been watching Liverpool doesn't qualify you any better to make a decision about who will make the grade here or not. If you truthfully believe it does, then I would have been spot on in my assessment of you.
You state the reasoning that he's a product of the previous regime and then dismiss my claims that so were Agger, Kuyt and Reina too as rubbish. You're spot on, it is rubbish. I only used that example so it would be clear to you how stupid saying something like that was.
You then ask what's that got to do with your opinion on Maxi, nothing - but proceed to mention that you've been watching Liverpool since the 1980s again and act as if that's some defining factor in deciding what constitutes a Liverpool player. Liverpool have had many unspectacular players over the years, it's not about who has the most "best players" it's about who has the best team.
If he's had a "good spell" under Kenny, why is it so out of the realms of possibility that he could keep it going. As for my alleged football knowledge, you should be questioning it, because if it or the logic that I have used to reach my conclusions is wrong - it should be up for scrutiny.
Saying Maxi is not versatile is wrong. He can play comfortably in a number of positions.
Saying Maxi is very dire is wrong. The fact you believe he's "very dire" instead of "not quite good enough" leads me to believe you're on a genuine crusade against him.
Saying Maxi has no "definitive attributes" again is probably helping my argument more about this is genuinely about "how you see football" rather that it being a case of "Maxi having no definite attributes".
Quality little snide remark at the end though, but I'm pleased you wouldn't stoop to such "childish depths" and "sarcastic managerial comments" because you're above all that. I
may be am a c**t but I don't pretend I'm above it. I'm off for a jog now.
Logged