Seeing as this debate continues to rumble here is Mcarz's very good description of Skrtel.
He's had his good seasons and his poor ones but he's always played in a similar manner.
- Drops far too deep at times
- Rarely stays in line with the rest of the defence
- Can get attracted to the ball too much
- Constantly pulling people to the ground in the box (somehow he hasn't given away 20 pens a season)
- Hoofs the ball up field too often
+ Very good at slide tackling
+ Decent short passing
+ OK strength, could be better though
+ Can be strong aerially
IMO he shouldn't be anymore than 4th choice now. If we can get a group of 4 better than him then we should go for it. Lovren, Sakho, Matip and one more with Gomez as somebody who can provide back up across the entire back line.
Harry also says exactly why Klopp will most probably move him on first.
We had this debate during Brendan's time, it was clear Skrtel didn't suit aggressive front foot defending, he is happy being the 'mop' at the back. A combination of a high line, Skrtel and Mignolet who stays rooted it is a recipe for disaster.
Kenny and Rafa, as Harry rightly points out, set up in a way that Skrtel could defend reasonably well in. However using Brendan's time here as any kind of a defence for any defender is laughable, only a brief spell of about 10 games where we had 6 away clean sheets on the spin did we ever look close to 'secure' at the back. That fell apart and when looked back on as a whole it is much easier to praise Brendan as the attacking coach than it is to dwell on his poor defensive record.
As for Jürgen backing Skrtel, he's simply inherited him. Sure he may have chosen him above Toure against Saints but other than that I don't think he's had too many occasions to actually chose him ahead of anyone due to injuries. We'll know come the summer but to me it looks as if the writing is very much on the wall.
Logged