Just to clear things up here because I think quite a few have missed the point Brian was trying to raise. Nowhere in his opening post did I read "we should sell", he's asking, with the money we'd get for them, would it be more beneficial to the club. It's a similar thing to the 80 mill for Gerrard thread, with that money we could buy an able replacement and improve other areas.
Now I've already said I think Brian was a little optimistic with his valuations of Xabi and Masch, but that's because of the way I am and don't think any player in this world should be sold for 50 million plus. If a club holds a player that highly, they shouldn't be selling them in the first place. Plus with 50 million, you could buy entire football clubs and save them from administration, to spend on just one player is ludicrous in my opinion but that's the way this sport and the world in general is going. People, by and large, are no longer interested in helping each other, instead it's a money driven world. But I'm going off topic here, so I'll try and get back to it.
Would it be more beneficial to sell for, what I'd consider, slightly more realistic estimations of somewhere between 45 and 50 million and improve the other areas. Well, I doubt we'd get two better central midfielders and it's such an important role on a football field that on the surface it looks like it wouldn't be. But if we can get box to box midfielders, like for example Mark Noble and Michael Johnson, then maybe it could be. If they could form an understanding of one holds while the other sits, like Gerrard and Barry had for England, then at least it's one extra body getting in and around the box which with Xabi and Masch we don't have often enough. It would also give us a bit of bread to spend on a top class left winger, which is the area we have never found somebody for in Benitez' five years. We've always been doing with poor quality left wingers (Kewell, Gonzalez, Riera) or make shift left wingers (Aurelio, Garcia, Riise, Babel).
So in the long run, depending on who we would actually sign, it could be more beneficial to lose them. Although I'd be disappointed to see them both go, I can see why it could (for those who can't read) be beneficial. Like I said though, it depends on who we sign with the money. If with the 45-50 million, I'd expect, we got we just blow it on David Villa is it more beneficial as the central midfield area would then be contested between Gerrard, Lucas, Spearing and Plessis.
Logged