Oh so I'm the rude one here, OK gotcha! Wow!
BTW its hard to take someone seriously when they claim Origi is in anyway better than Sadio, Bobby or Mo.
I'll say again, if you consider Origi so good then you must be annoyed that Klopp doesn't start him more often.
If you explain your side better then I'll respect it.
I definitely didn't say that you're rude. Who am I to judge you? I just requested that you respect others' line of thought.
If you need explanation, it's still the same. Sadio, Bobby or Mo wouldn't perform perfectly every time. It's also in line with your thoughts. Sometimes they'd drop the ball. Here's where I say, he'd come in and fill any lapses where the front three sometimes leave. He gets the job done and does it very well. Irregardless of quality. Divock has his own way of getting the job done. On that, he's a good enough cover for me. It's an ecosystem where Divock comes in and covers any lapses. Nothing on quality or who's better. As of now Divock can get the job done. Origi is good. Good enough as a cover. Neither did I say Origi should start ahead of the three if they're fit, unless it's a Klopp tactical special that we don't understand.
This system is good enough for me because it's good enough for klopp. You may desire other systems. I respect that. We all respect that. That's between you and the system klopp is using now. And I've never once said your views are wrong. You have your own argument. So let's leave it as that. Our views differ. It's not like you're right and I'm wrong, or I'm right and you're wrong. Both perspectives are valid and have some truth in them.
For the record, I've decided to put you on ignore. Because you appear to make people out to be what they aren't without understanding or clarifying their position.
Don't bother replying. I respectfully disengage from my conversation with you. If you may. If this was a court case, congratulations. You have successfully worn me out. Well before the first ball is kicked.
Logged