Migs stays on his line he walks over and picks that ball up before it hits the bottom corner. If Lanzini tries another shot, he's on his weaker side facing away from goal.
He should have stayed on his line. Plain and simple.
I know you are a big critic of his. So I understand that no matter what, he would be criticised.
It goes like this. He was too slow off his line against Ayew, but too quick off his line against Lanzini. In other words, he should have come off his line for Ayew (and the complaint is, he hesitated), but he should have stayed on his line for Lanzini (and the complaint is, he didn't hesitate).
You see... he's always in the wrong. If he had stayed on his line against Lanzini, the complaint would have been "why did he not come for the ball?".
Logged