Trending Topics

      Next match: v [] Thu 1st Jan @ 1:00 am

      Today is the 22nd of May and on this date LFC's match record is P10 W7 D0 L3

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Are LFC genuinely interested?

      Yes we are ready to go head to head to sign him
      49 (44.1%)
      No, it's PR spin
      62 (55.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 109

      Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)

      Read 267102 times
      0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1449: Jul 24, 2017 12:06:20 pm
      Grammar wouldn't be your strongest though Riba would it?
      Believe it or not spelling and grammar are not the same thing. I will not deny that I make grammar errors, but my grammar is better than most people's. I see people writing should of or you was frequently on here when it should be should have and you were, but I rarely pick people up on it. I picked him up on his spelling because he attempted to insult me. Your grammar made little sense there because you used an adverb without an adjective. If you want to mention about others grammar your's also needs to be at a higher standard.
      « Last Edit: Jul 24, 2017 12:17:36 pm by Ribapuru »
      PurpleMonkey
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 10,000 posts | 1991 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1450: Jul 24, 2017 12:21:57 pm
      Does it matter if someone here have poor grammar or spelling? As long as they get their point across, who cares? The only posters I see here with near perfect English would be,  BBB and Stuey!! :D
      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,818 posts | 2724 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1451: Jul 24, 2017 12:23:27 pm
      maybe we will lowball at 66m when they want 70m anyway.

      zzzzzzzzzz
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1452: Jul 24, 2017 12:50:29 pm
      Love a transfer window, sniping and bickering in every thread as normally half sane people go full on transfer muppett.  >:D :f_tongueincheek:
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,985 posts | 3061 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1453: Jul 24, 2017 12:53:38 pm
      Does it matter if someone here have poor grammar or spelling? As long as they get their point across, who cares? The only posters I see here with near perfect English would be,  BBB and Stuey!! :D

      I take great exception to that remark PM!

      As for BBB and Stuey......borderline literate if you ask me  :f_tongueincheek:
      Salavaria
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 381 posts | 41 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1454: Jul 24, 2017 01:21:15 pm
      If you want to mention about others grammar your's also needs to be at a higher standard.

      If you want to mention others' grammar yours also needs to be at a higher standard.

      You are talking about multiple others so the apostrophe comes after the s.
      No need for an apostrophe to indicate possession because yours is itself a possessive pronoun.

       ;D
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,421 posts | 6420 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1455: Jul 24, 2017 02:04:10 pm

      But you can't spell "at least". ;D
      clint_call01
      • King Live Match Starter
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,726 posts | 3740 
      • Ynwa... lfc till I die !
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1456: Jul 24, 2017 02:14:19 pm
      I honestly think this will happen between now and the end of the transfer window.
      zz19a
      • The Mighty REDS 19
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,605 posts | 166 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1457: Jul 24, 2017 02:21:55 pm
      But you can't spell "at least". ;D

       ;D ;D ;D :D
      FRANS
      • Forum Billy Liddell
      • ****

      • 551 posts | 19 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1458: Jul 24, 2017 02:23:45 pm
      I honestly think this will happen between now and the end of the transfer window.

      We  can't   wait  till  the deadline  day,it must happen  now.There must be more than enough time to look for other options  .
      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,818 posts | 2724 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1459: Jul 24, 2017 02:25:51 pm
      I take great exception to that remark PM!

      As for BBB and Stuey......borderline literate if you ask me  :f_tongueincheek:

      I also take offence at that, what exactly is wrong with my spelling or grammar, content is another thing!! ;-)
      « Last Edit: Jul 24, 2017 02:39:35 pm by heimdall »
      Magillionare
      • Official LFC Reds Sig Maker. Lives on Sesame Street.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,918 posts | 2381 
      • Hold on a minute, John Wayne hasn't arrived yet.
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1460: Jul 24, 2017 02:51:04 pm
      Believe it or not spelling and grammar are not the same thing. I will not deny that I make grammar errors, but my grammar is better than most people's. I see people writing should of or you was frequently on here when it should be should have and you were, but I rarely pick people up on it. I picked him up on his spelling because he attempted to insult me. Your grammar made little sense there because you used an adverb without an adjective. If you want to mention about others grammar your's also needs to be at a higher standard.

      :lmao:

      Touched a nerve I see.

      I'm no grammar expert either, but my sentence makes perfect sense to read but have fun figuring out what part of other posts of mine are superlative adjectives or which are adverbs or if I've broken any rules of grammar, I don't care as long as I get my point across. That point was; you're being a knob, and I think I got that point over quite well (but I suppose it is a well trodden path).
      clint_call01
      • King Live Match Starter
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,726 posts | 3740 
      • Ynwa... lfc till I die !
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1461: Jul 24, 2017 03:58:00 pm
      We  can't   wait  till  the deadline  day,it must happen  now.There must be more than enough time to look for other options  .

      I agree, we need him now so as to settle quickly and get his fitness up to the level.
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1462: Jul 24, 2017 04:00:47 pm
      I agree, we need him now so as to settle quickly and get his fitness up to the level.

      You don't think Lovren and Matip could handle it for a couple of weeks?
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,421 posts | 6420 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1463: Jul 24, 2017 04:08:46 pm
      You don't think Lovren and Matip could handle it for a couple of weeks?

      You ok with Lovren playing in the CL qualifier? I'm not.
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 36,039 posts | 3964 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1464: Jul 24, 2017 04:18:46 pm
      You don't think Lovren and Matip could handle it for a couple of weeks?

      Well if they carry on as they have done in the Prem last season we won't get beyond the qualification stage.
      shabbadoo
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 29,476 posts | 4594 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1465: Jul 24, 2017 04:27:06 pm
      You ok with Lovren playing in the CL qualifier? I'm not.

      Lovren not part of the team that get us into the CL spots?..

      & now you think he ain't good enough to play in a qualifier?..
      Breeding-Reds-In-The-434
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,222 posts | 1109 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1466: Jul 24, 2017 04:39:19 pm
      I would rather not have Lovern playing at all  :lmao:. I know we all would love for this to get wrapped up quickly, but as long as this gets wrapped up before the window is over I'll be fine with it. Would I love to have him soon and fit? Sure. But I don't wanna get discouraged in the next few weeks and give up on him all together. Think big picture and just get it done before the window closes. Signing him sets you up long term and helps us be in champions league year end and year out.
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1467: Jul 24, 2017 05:00:00 pm
      You ok with Lovren playing in the CL qualifier? I'm not.

      If he can't even play in the qualifier then he should be released...I seem to recall matches against  United, Dortmund and Villarreal that he was somehow able to muddle through.
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,421 posts | 6420 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1468: Jul 24, 2017 05:08:47 pm
      If he can't even play in the qualifier then he should be released...I seem to recall matches against  United, Dortmund and Villarreal that he was somehow able to muddle through.

      Then why are we looking for his replacement at 60-70m?
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1469: Jul 24, 2017 05:10:58 pm
      Is this what it's come to? We've gone from looking like signing a top class CB to people crying about grammar. Give your head a wobble or may as well just lock the topic now.
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1470: Jul 24, 2017 05:17:18 pm
      Then why are we looking for his replacement at 60-70m?

      Don't think there are many players in the squad that could not be improved upon; same time the players we have not are not sh*te either.

      Heads have truly fallen off.
      green_bear
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,042 posts | 289 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1471: Jul 24, 2017 05:30:18 pm
      Don't think there are many players in the squad that could not be improved upon; same time the players we have not are not sh*te either.

      Heads have truly fallen off.

      Just curious, what's your opinion on Moreno mate?  ;D

      Quick Reply