What did he do last season to justify him staying on? £18 million for a player who was injured up until November. Then following that he only made 9 starts in which he made no impression. Yes people say when we started him we won games more comfortably (which was a rarity for last season) but that's the result you always get when you replace an attacking minded player in place of a defensive player like Lucas. Sorry but the moment Joe Cole walked into Liverpool this was coming. And I'd much rather have Joe Cole playing with Gerrard and Masch behind him, leaving Aquilani on the bench. Play Aquilani and one of those players is dropped. And for an £18 million rated player - that's the last place you'd want to be. Aquilani came to Liverpool as a first eleven player. Not as an impact sub. Roy made the correct call in my view.
I'm sorry FMS but after reading your post through a few times, I'm still confused.
*
". ...a player who was injured up until November. Then following that he only made 9 starts in which he made no impression. ...when we started him we won games more comfortably (which was a rarity for last season) "You'll have to explain that one to me. So he made "no impression" except for the fact that "when we started him" we "won more games comfortably". What?
*
". ..but that's the result you always get when you replace an attacking minded player in place of a defensive player like Lucas"What are you saying here? We shouldn't be wanting to win comfortably because we would have to drop a defensive midfielder to do so? Eh?
*
"Sorry but the moment Joe Cole walked into Liverpool this was coming."The subsequent events would seem to give testimony to that FMS but why should that have been the case? Are you really suggesting that at Liverpool we have no room, in a long hard season, for more than one creative mid-fielder?
*
"£18 million for a player who was injured up until November."Alberto, like Cole, was indeed injured for a big part of last season. So maybe it's just his price tag that's the problem? We may be getting somewhere here. When Juve pay us 15m Euros for Alberto, next season, he will have only cost us 5m in total. It seem that, when push comes to shove, our board decide who plays for us based on finance rather than footballing ability.
After all i'm sure Roy, a man renowned for his coaching/management abilities (Manager of the year) and his man management abilities (which Rafa lacked, we're told), who said this about Alberto; "There has never been any question about Alberto's talents," . ..."It is obvious for all to see that he is a gifted footballer": could very easily accommodated him in a long season that demands rotation. In fact I have no doubt that Roy, given the chance, would have loved him to stay.
The decision to get rid of Alberto wasn't down to any footballing reasons; just money. The board made this call - Roy just does what he's told.
Logged