Sorry but your reasons for why you think De Bruyne is terrible are not above, you just stated an opinion
Stated my opinion which is therefore my reasons...
then soem weird crap about stats not reflecting reality which made no sense at all, especially when judging a striker.
Should have known there would be somebody who would be unable to get their around it. Obviously it's hit you hard this one.
Okay, I will try and dumb it down lad...Stats not reflecting reality; Here's an example, Suarez has 50 shots and scores 20 goals, Rondon has 10 shots and scores 9 goals. The stats would suggest Rondon is the better player to have up top but in actual fact, it's not the case at all. Therefore the stats aren't reflecting the reality of the 2.
Another example, Joe Allen has a 100% pass success rate but virtually all of them are a few yards sideways, Xabi Alonso has a 70% pass success rate, does this make Allen better than Alonso? No.
Link that to Matic for example, he is about joint 2nd highest in assists with 6, yet he has been inconsistent and a shadow of Kante this season.
especially when judging a striker
Why does judging a striker have to be an issue when I am stating my reason? Ibra has 11 goals but in large parts has been poor and went on a long goal drought. Lukaku has 9 goals but has been pants.
Just because a player has high stats in something doesn't automatically mean they are having a great season.
I'm sure we would all like to know on what basis you are judging that De Bruyne has been terrible.
I won't say it again.
I'm not asking you to agree, I'm not even trying to debate it with you, I said my piece and don't need snardy replies from you just because you don't agree. Take a leaf out of WAHS's book.
Logged