All general comments about Cascarino aside, I'd say he's spot on (if not stating the blatantly obvious).
Whether you like him or not, it's good to see someone in the media who's actually said something accurate with regard to Hodgson's time here. But then it doesn't make a blind bit of difference what the papers think. They're not going to have an effect on John W Henry's decision regarding the matter, and, on the whole, I'd say the majority of our fans can form their own opinions without having pundits spoon feed them. Not all, mind.
The sh*te that will spill out once he is inevitably relieved of his duties will still come though, with the usual suspects leading the charge.
Logged