You and redkop63, don't even say why he's bad. Just come up with "overrated, sh*t" etc.
Every single thing in attack went through him - he set up Phil, he won the ball high up the pitch, was the central figure to every counter attack. And then people come up with "Firmino was sh*t".
Even against Burnley, when actually was crap, the two chances we had to score were because of him.
But carry on.
I've explained why he
has been nothing more than average over our opening 3 fixtures. So, I don't want to regurgitate myself again, however, if you pop into the Firmino thread and have a look you will some some explanations for his averageness there.
Mind you, had he been "brilliant" as you have said, then I wonder why you or nobody else have popped into his thread to add the superlatives. The fact nobody has been in there to genuinely congratulate the bloke says it all really. People just saying he's brilliant for the sake of it are either on a wind-up, or are perpetuating themselves as a certain type of supporter who can really
only see what Firmino has done that is so brilliant, such is their eye and knowledge of the game that much superior - *cough bollocks cough*
Fella, I know "brilliant" when I see it, and so do many others on here, again pop into the player rating thread and you will see he got a mere 10% of the MOTM vote from the rest of the Reds. I can surmise from watching him play all three games and in particular the Spurs one, along with the resulting MOTM votes in that game that he was anything BUT brilliant.
He wasn't brilliant against Spurs, he was okay and he was f**king sh*te against Burnley and somewhere in between against Arsenal.
So please, stop perpetuating this bollocks of a myth.
Logged